| Referências: |
[1] Barbieri, C.; Koffler, S.; Leocadio, J.N.; Albertini, B.; Francoy, T.; Saraiva, A.M.; Ghilardi-Lopes, N.P., 2023. Evaluation of a Bee-focused Citizen Science Training Process: Influences of participants’ profile on learning. Sustainability, 15, 13545. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su151813545. [2] Bonney, R.; Cooper, C.B.; Dickinson, J.; Kelling, S.; Phillips, T.; Rosenberg, K.V.; Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, Volume 59, Issue 11, December 2009, Pages 977–984, https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9. [3] Chandler, M.; See, L.; Copas, K.; Bonde, A.M.Z.; López, B.C.; Danielsen, F.; Legind, J.K.; Masinde, S.; Miller-Rushing, A.J.; Newman, G.; Rosemartin, A.;Turak, E. (2017). Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation 213, Part B: 280-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004. [4] Dem, E.S., Rodríguez-Labajos, B., Wiemers, M. et al. Understanding the relationship between volunteers’ motivations and learning outcomes of Citizen Science in rice ecosystems in the Northern Philippines. Paddy Water Environ 16, 725–735 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0664-9. [5] Eitzel, M.V., Cappadonna, J.L., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R.E., Virapongse, A., West, S.E., Kyba, C.C.M., Bowser, A., Cooper, C.B., Sforzi, A., Metcalfe, A.N., Harris, E.S., Thiel, M., Haklay, M., Ponciano, L., Roche, J., Ceccaroni, L., Shilling, F.M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Kiessling, T., Davis, B.Y. and Jiang, Q., 2017. Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), p.1. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.96. [6] Fraisl, D., Campbell, J., See, L. et al. (2020). Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci 15: 1735–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7. [7] Freitag A, Pfeffer MJ (2013) Process, Not Product: Investigating Recommendations for Improving Citizen Science “Success”. PLoS ONE 8(5): e64079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064079. [8] Ghilardi-Lopes, N.P.; Zattara, E.E. (Orgs.) Ciência cidadã e polinizadores da América do Sul [livro eletrônico]. 1.ed. São Carlos, SP: Cubo Multimídia, 2022. 152p. ISBN 978-65-86819-20-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/978-65-86819-20-5.100001.pt. [9] Haklay, M. et al. 2021 Contours of citizen science: a vignette study. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8: 202108. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202108. [10] Koffler, S.; Ghilardi-Lopes, N.P.; Francoy, T.M.; Albertini, B.; Leocadio, J.; Barbiéri, C.; Nakamura, D.Y.M.; Caldeira, B.S.; Silva, L.; Yamamoto, Y.; Saraiva, A., 2021. Projeto #cidadãoasf: protocolo de monitoramento de atividade de voo em abelhas sem ferrão utilizando Ciência Cidadã. In: Ghilardi-Lopes, N.P. (Org.) Série Ciência Cidadã, volume 6. Santo André, SP: UFABC. 72p. ISBN: 978-6-55-719028-9. [11] Kosmala, M.; Wiggins, A.; Swanson, A.; Simmons, B. (2016). Assessing data quality in citizen science. Front Ecol Environ;14(10): 551–560, doi:10.1002/fee.1436. [12] Lewandowski, E.J., & Specht, H.M. (2015). Influence of volunteer and project characteristics on data quality of biological surveys. Conservation Biology, 29. [13] Lotfian, M.; Ingensand, J.; Brovelli, M.A. A Framework for Classifying Participant Motivation that Considers the Typology of Citizen Science Projects. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 704. https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/9/12/704/htm. [14] Mazumdar, S.; Ceccaroni, L.; Piera, J.; Hölker, F.; Berre, A.J.; Arlinghaus, R.; Bowser, A. (2018). Citizen science technologies and new opportunities for participation. In S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn. Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London, UCL Press. 303-320. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10058422/1/Citizen-Science.pdf. [15] Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Constas, M. and Bonney, R., 2018. A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2), p.3. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.126. [16] Robinson L.D., Cawthray, J.L., West, S.E., Bonn, A., & Ansine, J. (2018). Ten principles of citizen science. In S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn. Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London, UCL Press. 1–23. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10058422/1/Citizen-Science.pdf. [17] Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., and Jacobs, D. 2012. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, 217--226. [18] Seltzer C (2019) Making Biodiversity Data Social, Shareable, and Scalable: Reflections on iNaturalist & citizen science. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 3: e46670. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.46670. [19] Tweedle, J.C.; Robinson, L.; Pocock, M.J.O.; Roy, H.E. (2012). Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK. Natural History Museumand NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology forUK-EOF. Available online: www.ukeof.org.uk. ISBN: 978-1-906698-37-9. [20] Wiggins, A.; Crowston, K. (2011). From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In: 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, 2011, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207.
|
