Fundação Universidade Federal do ABC Santo André, 22 de Julho de 2024

Resumo do Componente Curricular

Dados Gerais do Componente Curricular
Tipo do Componente Curricular: DISCIPLINA
Tipo de Disciplina: REGULAR
Forma de Participação: DISCIPLINA REGULAR
Unidade Responsável: PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS (11.01.06.46)
Código: PPU-605
Nome: PLANNING, GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC POLICIES – THEORIES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN BRAZILIAN METROPOLITAN REGIONS
Carga Horária Teórica: 36 h.
Carga Horária Prática: 0 h.
Carga Horária Estudo Individual: 72 h.
Carga Horária Dedicada do Docente: 0 h.
Carga Horária Total: 108 h.
Pré-Requisitos:
Co-Requisitos:
Equivalências:
Excluir da Avaliação Institucional: Não
Matriculável On-Line: Sim
Horário Flexível da Turma: Não
Horário Flexível do Docente: Sim
Obrigatoriedade de Nota Final: Sim
Pode Criar Turma Sem Solicitação: Não
Necessita de Orientador: Não
Exige Horário: Sim
Permite CH Compartilhada: Não
Permite Múltiplas Aprovações: Não
Quantidade de Avaliações: 3
Ementa/Descrição: Key dimensions of contemporary planning debates: historical origins; justifications behind planning; the socio-economic and political limits to planning; planning styles and cultures; planning processes and products; new challenges in the XXI century; Regional development planning and policies – key theories and narratives; evolution of debates and effective practice; Urban planning, governance and reform (including the dilemma of metropolitan governance); Governance – evolution of a concept and its assimilation in the Brazilian context: potentials and limits; State restructuring, rescaling and transformations towards multilevel governance; The State, public institutions and Public Policy-Making; Local/regional democracy: Brazilian experiences in public participation.
Referências: ARTS, B., & LAGENDIJK, A. (2009). The Disoriented State. In B. Arts, A. Lagendijk, & H. van Houtum (Eds.), The Disoriented State: Shifts in Governmentality, Territoriality and Governance (pp. 231-247). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. FAINSTEIN, S. & CAMPBELL, S. (2012) “The structure and Debates of Planning Theory”, in Susan S. Fainstein and Scott Campbell (eds). Readings in Planning Theory. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 1-20. FAINSTEIN, S.S. (2000). New Directions in Planning Theory. Urban Affairs Review, Vol 35 (4): 451-78. FREY, K. (2008). Development, good governance, and local democracy. Brazilian Political Science Review, 2(2), 39-73. GÓMEZ-ÁLVAREZ, D., RAJACK, R., LÓPEZ-MORENO, E., & LANFRANCHI, G. (Eds.). (2017). Steering the Metropolis: Metropolitan Governance for Sustainable Urban Development. Washington: IDB. HEALEY, P. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, Vol 2 (2): 101-123. HEINELT, H. (2010). Governing modern societies: towards participatory governance. London and New York: Routledge; Chapter 6: Multi-level systems and flexible power geometry, p. 95- 122. HOLSTON, J. (2009). Insurgent Citizenship in an Era of Global Urban Peripheries. City&Society, v.21(7), pp. 245-267 HOOGHE, L., & MARKS, G. (2003). Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. The American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233-243. KJAER, A.M. (2012). Governance and the Urban Bureaucracy. In: Davies, J.S; Imbroscio, D. Theories of Urban Politics (2nd Ed.). Sage: Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC, p. 125-136 KLINK, J. & R. DENALDI (2015). On Urban Reform, rights and planning challenges in the Brazilian metropolis. Planning Theory, 1-16. KLINK, J. (2014). The Hollowing out of Metropolitan Governance as we know it: Restructuring and Rescaling the Developmental State in Metropolitan Space. Antipode, 46(3), pp. 629-649. MELO, M. A., & BAIOCCHI, G. (2006). Deliberative Democracy and Local Governance: Towards a New Agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 587-600. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00686.x RANDOLPH, R. e FREY, K. Planning and Governance: Towards Radical Political Approaches. In: Eraydin, A e Frey, Klaus (eds), Politics and Conflict in Governance and Planning, New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. 38 – 55. SANYAL, B.; LAWRENCE, J.V & ROSAN, C.D. (2012). “Four planning conversations“, In: Sanyal, B.; Lawrence, J.V & Rosan, C.D (eds). Planning Ideas that matter. Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and reflexive practice. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England. WATSON, V. (2009). ‘The planned city sweeps the poor away...’: Urban planning and 21st century urbanisation. Progress in Planning 72 (2009) 151–193 WATSON, V. (2016). Locating planning in the New Urban Agenda of the urban sustainable development goal. Planning Theory, v. 15(4), 435-448.

SIGAA | UFABC - Núcleo de Tecnologia da Informação - ||||| | Copyright © 2006-2024 - UFRN - sigaa-2.ufabc.int.br.sigaa-2-prod v4.9.3