Banca de DEFESA: GUILHERME NUNES PIRES

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : GUILHERME NUNES PIRES
DATA : 17/03/2022
HORA: 08:30
LOCAL: São Bernardo do Campo
TÍTULO:

Marx's complexity: foundations of Complexity Science and the actuality of his thought

PÁGINAS: 285
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
ÁREA: Economia
SUBÁREA: Teoria Econômica
ESPECIALIDADE: Teoria Geral da Economia
RESUMO:

The present study aims to defend the thesis that Karl Marx’s thought bears the general elements that underlie the contemporary scientific investigation of the so-called Complexity Science. Complexity Science emerged in the last century as a movement that seeks to reorient the ontological, epistemological, and methodological principles that guide contemporary scientific research, in opposition to the principles that were established with the birth of modern science, whose great names are Galileo Galilei, René Descartes, and Isaac Newton. With the birth of modern science, an analysis of nature and society based on atomism, reductionism, mechanism, and determinism was founded. In contrast, Complexity Science bases scientific analysis on systemism (systems theory), emergentism (emergency theory), and non-linear and non-deterministic causality. It’s from these two great science perspectives of the modern period that Marx’s thought has been approached. On one hand, the hegemonic view propagated by Marx’s critics is based on the argument that his theoretical framework is supported by outdated scientific conceptions, above all, by reductionism and determinism. On the other hand, some authors linked to Marxism argue that the German thinker anticipates many insights from Complexity Science. However, there is no systematization of the relationship between the scientific foundations based on systems theory, emergence theory, and a non- linear and non-deterministic and those that govern Marx’s thought. Thus, in addition to pointing out the limits of criticisms of Marx’s thought, it is intended to argue that it is possible to find the general elements that underlie the scientific reorientation of Complexity Science. It is intended to demonstrate the incompatibility of Marx’s thought with reductionism and determinism;  that (2) Marx’s conception of society as a complex of complexes, in which each social complex has relative autonomy of development, is similar to that which underlies the most developed contemporary systems theories; (2) the ontological distinction between the physical, biological and social domains and the relational conception of society in Marx supports positions found in views of the emergency theory; (4) Marx’s view of causality and scientific laws is similar to non-linear and non-deterministic notion of Complexity Science.

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Presidente - Interno ao Programa - 1802140 - JOSE PAULO GUEDES PINTO
Membro Titular - Examinador(a) Interno ao Programa - 344365 - RAMON VICENTE GARCIA FERNANDEZ
Membro Titular - Examinador(a) Externo à Instituição - ELEUTERIO FERNANDO DA SILVA PRADO
Membro Titular - Examinador(a) Externo à Instituição - JORGE LUÍS DA SILVA GRESPAN - USP
Membro Titular - Examinador(a) Externo à Instituição - João Antônio de Paula - UFMG
Membro Suplente - Examinador(a) Interno ao Programa - 1380717 - PARIS YEROS
Membro Suplente - Examinador(a) Externo ao Programa - 2421353 - ANDREA SANTOS BACA