"The political potential of the intersection between thought, judgment and action in emergency situations in the philosophy of H. Arendt"
I argue in this thesis that from the intersection between thought, judgment and political action in urgent circumstances and in “emergency situations” emerges a political potential capable of responding to the refusal to think and the organized lie established in mass societies in the contemporary world. . The elaboration I built is supported and aligned with the work of Hannah Arendt. The main objective is to demonstrate that, despite the distinctions that characterize the activities of thought, judgment and political action in Arendt, these activities are not disruptive, so that we find in them elements that justify and substantiate the present thesis in accordance with the two preceding circumstances. Furthermore, although there are potentialities in each of these activities that are inherently their own, the thesis defends the existence of a specific political potential that emerges from the intersection and that, as such, is amplified, making it, as we said, a consistent response to the refusal to think and organized lies in mass societies.